Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarzenje, Aros D
dc.contributor.authorGjesdal, Knut
dc.contributor.authorWinsvold, Bendik K S
dc.contributor.authorSmåstuen, Milada Cvancarova
dc.contributor.authorStovner, Lars Jacob
dc.contributor.authorGravdahl, Gøril Bruvik
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Kristian Bernhard
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-21T14:13:25Z
dc.date.available2020-10-21T14:13:25Z
dc.date.created2020-10-13T14:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationCephalalgia Reports. 2020, 3 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2515-8163
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2684283
dc.description.abstractBackground: Both propranolol and candesartan are prophylactic drugs for migraine, but with unknown mechanisms of action. The objectives of the present study were to investigate these drugs’ effects on arterial wall dynamics and the potential relation between their vascular and clinical effect. Methods: The study was based on data from a previously published randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded, double crossover clinical trial comparing the prophylactic effects of candesartan and propranolol in 72 patients. Finapres noninvasive blood pressure curves were analyzed. On the descending limb of the pulse curve, a notch is produced by pulse wave reflection, and its relative height compared to the top of the curve (the notch ratio) was used as a marker of arterial wall stiffness. Results: Candesartan decreased the notch ratio from baseline (p = 0.005), reflecting more compliant arteries and vasodilation, whereas propranolol increased the notch ratio (p = 0.005), reflecting less compliant arteries and vasoconstriction. There was no difference in baseline notch ratio between clinical responders and nonresponders. Conclusion: The drugs are both efficient prophylactic medications, yet they have opposite effects on arterial wall dynamics. This suggests that drug effects other than those on arterial compliance must be responsible for their prophylactic effect in migraine.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleClinical and vascular responses to propranolol and candesartan in migraine patients: A randomized controlled clinical trialen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-8en_US
dc.source.volume3en_US
dc.source.journalCephalalgia Reportsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2515816320946491
dc.identifier.cristin1839243
dc.description.localcodeCreative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal