Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKuttner, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorLassen, Martin Lyngby
dc.contributor.authorØen, Silje Kjærnes
dc.contributor.authorSundset, Rune
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorEikenes, Live
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T09:41:01Z
dc.date.available2020-03-16T09:41:01Z
dc.date.created2019-07-02T10:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationActa Radiologica. 2019, 1-10.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0284-1851
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2646891
dc.description.abstractBackground Positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may become increasingly important for assessing tumor therapy response. A prerequisite for quantitative PET/MR imaging is reliable and repeatable MR-based attenuation correction (AC). Purpose To investigate the frequency and test–retest reproducibility of artifacts in MR-AC maps in a lung cancer patient cohort and to study the impact of artifact corrections on PET-based tumor quantification. Material and Methods Twenty-five lung cancer patients underwent single-day, test–retest, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MR imaging. The acquired MR-AC maps were inspected for truncation, susceptibility, and tissue inversion artifacts. An anatomy-based bone template and a PET-based estimation of truncated arms were employed, while susceptibility artifacts were corrected manually. We report the frequencies of artifacts and the relative difference (RD) on standardized uptake value (SUV) based quantification in PET images reconstructed with the corrected AC maps. Results Truncation artifacts were found in all 50 acquisitions (100%), while susceptibility and tissue inversion artifacts were observed in six (12%) and 26 (52%) of the scans, respectively. The RD in lung tumor SUV was < 5% from bone and truncation corrections, while up to 20% RD was introduced after susceptibility artifact correction, with large inconsistencies between test–retest scans. Conclusion The absence of bone and truncation artifacts have limited effect on the PET quantification of lung lesions. In contrast, susceptibility artifacts caused significant and inconsistent underestimations of the lung tumor SUVs, between test–retest scans. This may have clinical implications for patients undergoing serial imaging for tumor therapy response assessment.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsnb_NO
dc.titleQuantitative PET/MR imaging of lung cancer in the presence of artifacts in the MR-based attenuation correction mapsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-10nb_NO
dc.source.journalActa Radiologicanb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0284185119848118
dc.identifier.cristin1709224
dc.description.localcode© 2020. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 1.1.2021 due to copyright restrictions. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185119848118nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel