dc.contributor.author | Krawcowicz, Barbara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-17T10:18:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-17T10:18:06Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-06-19T16:51:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. 2019, 31 (1), 34-39. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0943-3058 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2633573 | |
dc.description.abstract | In a search for a theoretical framework that would structure and orient a comparative analysis of diverse Jewish theological responses to the Holocaust, the author reached for J.Z. Smith’s discussions of comparative enterprise. The questions of similarity, difference and of the putative goal of comparison loomed large over her project. In J.Z. Smith’s work, the author found helpful clues, illuminating insights as well as somewhat confusing and counterintuitive examples. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | Brill | nb_NO |
dc.title | It is not magic, it is smith: Comparison in a study of Jewish theology | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 34-39 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 31 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Method & Theory in the Study of Religion | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 1 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1163/15700682-12341460 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1706201 | |
dc.description.localcode | © 2019. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript. Locked until 12 February 2021 due to copyright restrictions. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341460. | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 194,62,70,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for filosofi og religionsvitenskap | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |