Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrawcowicz, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-17T10:18:06Z
dc.date.available2019-12-17T10:18:06Z
dc.date.created2019-06-19T16:51:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationMethod & Theory in the Study of Religion. 2019, 31 (1), 34-39.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0943-3058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2633573
dc.description.abstractIn a search for a theoretical framework that would structure and orient a comparative analysis of diverse Jewish theological responses to the Holocaust, the author reached for J.Z. Smith’s discussions of comparative enterprise. The questions of similarity, difference and of the putative goal of comparison loomed large over her project. In J.Z. Smith’s work, the author found helpful clues, illuminating insights as well as somewhat confusing and counterintuitive examples.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBrillnb_NO
dc.titleIt is not magic, it is smith: Comparison in a study of Jewish theologynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber34-39nb_NO
dc.source.volume31nb_NO
dc.source.journalMethod & Theory in the Study of Religionnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15700682-12341460
dc.identifier.cristin1706201
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript. Locked until 12 February 2021 due to copyright restrictions. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341460.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,70,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for filosofi og religionsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record