Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNordahl, Henrik
dc.contributor.authorWells, Adrian
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-18T08:52:19Z
dc.date.available2019-11-18T08:52:19Z
dc.date.created2019-10-15T08:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0813-4839
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2628884
dc.description.abstractWork ability is a prospective predictor of sick leave, disability pension and unemployment, and has been defined as the balance between human resources and the demands of work, taking into consideration that illness is not equivalent to work disability. In the present study we set out to explore predictors of work ability in a sample of individuals with common mental disorders. In particular, we were interested in exploring metacognitive beliefs as a potential predictor of work ability, as Wells’ (2009) metacognitive model of psychological disorder suggests that metacognitions may be an underlying factor in psychological vulnerability generally, and they have been associated with work status in previous studies. One hundred and seventy-seven individuals participated in an online survey and completed a battery of self-report questionnaires. Several factors correlated with reduced work ability: physical disorders, emotional distress symptoms and metacognitive beliefs. We found that confidence in memory predicted work ability even when controlling for gender/age, number of physical disorders, and levels of anxiety and depression symptoms. This finding suggest that metacognitions of poor memory performance are associated with low work ability among those with common mental disorders, and implies that these should be targeted in treatment with a view to increasing work ability and thus potentially facilitate return to work.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressnb_NO
dc.titlePredictors of Work Ability in Individuals With a Common Mental Disorder: Is There an Effect of Metacognitive Beliefs Among Poor Physical Health and Emotional Distress?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalBehaviour changenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/bec.2019.15
dc.identifier.cristin1737044
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 14.4.2020 due to copyright restrictions.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode1920,0,0,0
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameSt. Olavs Hospital HF
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel