Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFøreland, Solveig
dc.contributor.authorRobertsen, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorHegseth, Marit Nøst
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-17T08:00:55Z
dc.date.available2019-09-17T08:00:55Z
dc.date.created2019-07-17T10:39:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSH@W Safety and Health at Work. 2019, 10 (3), 370-376.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2093-7911
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2617119
dc.description.abstractBackground Respirator fit testing is a method to assess if the respirator provides an adequate face seal for the worker. Methods Workers from four Norwegian smelters were invited to participate in the study, and 701 respirator fit tests were performed on 127 workers. Fourteen respirator models were included: one FFABE1P3 and 11 FFP3 respirator models produced in one size and two silicone half masks with P3 filters available in three sizes. The workers performed a quantitative fit test according to Health and Safety Executive 282/28 with 5–6 different respirator models, and they rated the respirators based on comfort. Predictors of overall fit factors were explored. Results The pass rate for all fit tests was 62%, 56% for women, and 63% for men. The silicone respirators had the highest percentage of passed tests (92–100%). The pass rate for the FFP3 models varied from 19–89%, whereas the FFABE1P3 respirator had a pass rate of 36%. Five workers did not pass with any respirators, and 14 passed with all the respirators tested. Only 63% passed the test with the respirator they normally used. The mean comfort score on the scale from 1 to 5 was 3.2. The respirator model was the strongest predictor of the overall fit factor. The other predictors (age, sex, and comfort score) did not improve the fit of the model. Conclusion There were large differences in how well the different respirator models fitted the Norwegian smelter workers. The results can be useful when choosing which respirators to include in respirator fit testing programs in similar populations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791118304864
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDo Various Respirator Models Fit the Workers in the Norwegian Smelting Industry?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber370-376nb_NO
dc.source.volume10nb_NO
dc.source.journalSH@W Safety and Health at Worknb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.004
dc.identifier.cristin1711748
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 245216nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeOpen Access CC BY-NC-ND 4.0nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,90,0
cristin.unitcode1920,8,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geovitenskap og petroleum
cristin.unitnameKlinikk for lunge og arbeidsmedisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal