Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSiverbo, Sven Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorCäker, Mikael
dc.contributor.authorÅkesson, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T06:11:20Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T06:11:20Z
dc.date.created2019-06-09T11:55:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1471-9037
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2600397
dc.description.abstractPerformance measurement (PM) has become increasingly popular in the management of public sector organizations (PSOs). This is somewhat paradoxical considering that PM has been criticized for having dysfunctional consequences. Although there are reasons to believe that PM may have dysfunctional consequences, when they occur has not been clarified. The aim of this research is to conceptualize the dysfunctional consequences of PM in PSOs. Based on complementarity theory and contingency theory we conclude that dysfunctional consequences of PM are a matter of interactions between PM design and PM use, between control practices in the control system and between PM and context.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.titleConceptualizing dysfunctional consequences of performance measurement in the public sectornb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalPublic Management Reviewnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14719037.2019.1577906
dc.identifier.cristin1703646
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 14 March 2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Public Management Review on 14 March 2019, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577906.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,60,10,0
cristin.unitnameNTNU Handelshøyskolen
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel