• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Usability testing of EirV3-a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer

Krogstad, Hilde; Sundt-Hansen, Stine Marie; Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen; Hågensen, Liv Ågot; Kaasa, Stein; Loge, Jon Håvard; Raj, Sunil Xavier; Steinsbekk, Aslak; Sand, Kari
Journal article
Submitted version
Thumbnail
Åpne
EirUsabilitypaper_20180815_Cristin.docx (323.8Kb)
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2581187
Utgivelsesdato
2018
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Institutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin [2599]
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie [2408]
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [26591]
Originalversjon
Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018, 1-10.   10.1007/s00520-018-4435-3
Sammendrag
Purpose

Eir version 3 (V3) is an electronic tool for administration of patient-reported outcome measures (Eir-Patient) that immediately presents patient scores on the physician’s computer (Eir-Doctor). Perceived usability is an important determinant for successful implementation. The aim of this study was to answer the following research question evaluated at the cancer outpatient clinics, in the patients’ home, and at general practitioners’ (GPs) offices: What are the number, type, and severity of usability issues evaluated by the patient (Eir-Patient module) and by the physician (Eir-Doctor module)?

Methods

A usability evaluation using observations, think-aloud sessions, individual interviews and focus group interviews in cancer patients and their physicians was conducted. Identified usability issues were graded on a severity scale from 1 (irritant) to 4 (unusable).

Results

Overall, 73 Eir registrations were performed by 37 patients, and used by 17 physicians in clinical consultations. All patients were able to complete the Eir-Patient symptom registration. Seventy-two usability issues were identified. None of them were graded as unusable. For the Eir-Patient module, 62% of the identified usability issues was graded as irritant (grade 1), 18% as moderate (grade 2), and 20% as severe (grade 3). For the Eir-Doctor module, 46% of the identified usability issues were graded as irritant, 36% as moderate and 18% as severe.

Conclusions

In the updated Eir version, issues in the severe and moderate categories have been changed, to optimize the usability of using real-time PROMs in clinical practice.
Utgiver
Springer Verlag
Tidsskrift
Supportive Care in Cancer

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit