Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrømskag, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorValenta, Anita
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T12:06:27Z
dc.date.available2018-04-11T12:06:27Z
dc.date.created2017-12-20T21:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-873769-73-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2493667
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we investigate a pre-service teacher’s whole-class discussion at Grade 6, where she attempts to justify the general claim that multiplication is commutative in ℕ. Our analysis points at two conditions that constrain the discussion in class: The first is that the diagram used to represent a multiplicative situation—and the way the diagram is used—is inadequate because it does not illustrate the meaning of multiplication. The second is that the diagram enables the students to respond “adequately”, even if they may not have understood why multiplication is commutative. The latter is a constraint because it deprives the pre-service teacher of the opportunity to get feedback that might have let her understand that she would need to revise her intervention.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEuropean Society for Research in Mathematics Educationnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10)
dc.titleConstraints to a justification of commutativity of multiplicationnb_NO
dc.typeChapternb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber520-528nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1530708
dc.description.localcodePublished by European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Copyright the authors 2017.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,63,15,0
cristin.unitcode194,67,80,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for matematiske fag
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for lærerutdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel