Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBirgisdottir, Harpa
dc.contributor.authormoncaster, alice
dc.contributor.authorHoulihan Wiberg, Aoife Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorChae, Chang-U
dc.contributor.authorYokoyama, Keizo
dc.contributor.authorBalouktsi, Maria
dc.contributor.authorseo, Seongwon
dc.contributor.authoroka, Tatsuo
dc.contributor.authorLutzkendorf, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorMalmqvist, Tove
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-18T15:15:01Z
dc.date.available2018-01-18T15:15:01Z
dc.date.created2017-10-05T00:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergy and Buildings. 2017, 154 72-80.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2478240
dc.description.abstractThe current regulations to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from buildings have focused on operational energy consumption. Thus legislation excludes measurement and reduction of the embodied energy and embodied GHG emissions over the building life cycle. Embodied impacts are a significant and growing proportion and it is increasingly recognized that the focus on reducing operational energy consumption needs to be accompanied by a parallel focus on reducing embodied impacts. Over the last six years the Annex 57 has addressed this issue, with researchers from 15 countries working together to develop a detailed understanding of the multiple calculation methods and the interpretation of their results. Based on an analysis of 80 case studies, Annex 57 showed various inconsistencies in current methodological approaches, which inhibit comparisons of results and difficult development of robust reduction strategies. Reinterpreting the studies through an understanding of the methodological differences enabled the cases to be used to demonstrate a number of important strategies for the reduction of embodied impacts. Annex 57 has also produced clear recommendations for uniform definitions and templates which improve the description of system boundaries, completeness of inventory and quality of data, and consequently the transparency of embodied impact assessments.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleIEA EBC Annex 57 ‘Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2eq for Building Construction’nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber72-80nb_NO
dc.source.volume154nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergy and Buildingsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.030
dc.identifier.cristin1502376
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: ZEB 614005nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2017 by Elseviernb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,61,55,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for arkitektur og teknologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record