dc.contributor.author | Siddiqui, Afzal | |
dc.contributor.author | Fleten, Stein-Erik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-20T06:36:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-20T06:36:21Z | |
dc.date.created | 2010-06-08T14:08:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Energy Economics. 2010, 32 (4), 817-830. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-9883 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2461136 | |
dc.description.abstract | Concerns about CO2 emissions create incentives for the development and deployment of energy technologies that do not use fossil fuels. Indeed, such technologies would provide tangible benefits in terms of avoided fossil-fuel costs, which are likely to increase as restrictions on CO2 emissions are imposed. However, a number of challenges need to be overcome prior to market deployment, and the commercialisation of alternative energy technologies may require a staged approach given price and technical risk. We analyse how a firm may proceed with staged commercialisation and deployment of competing alternative energy technologies. An unconventional new alternative technology is one possibility, where one could undertake cost-reducing production enhancement measures as an intermediate step prior to deployment. By contrast, the firm could choose to deploy a smaller-scale existing renewable energy technology, and, using the real options framework, we compare the two projects to provide managerial implications on how one might proceed. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | nb_NO |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | How to proceed with competing alternative energy technologies: A real options analysis | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 817-830 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 32 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Energy Economics | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 4 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.12.007 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 340049 | |
dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 199904 | nb_NO |
dc.description.localcode | © 2010. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 194,60,25,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for industriell økonomi og teknologiledelse | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |