• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for informasjonsteknologi og elektroteknikk (IE)
  • Institutt for matematiske fag
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for informasjonsteknologi og elektroteknikk (IE)
  • Institutt for matematiske fag
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Mixture models for flood frequency analysis - A case study for Norway

Hindenes, Silje
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
17860_FULLTEXT.pdf (1.300Mb)
17860_COVER.pdf (1.556Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2458159
Date
2017
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for matematiske fag [1435]
Abstract
Flood frequency analysis (FFA) concerns prediction of the magnitude and corresponding frequency of extreme flood events. Extreme floods can be the result of various hydrological processes. In Norway, rainfall and snowmelt are considered to be the two main flood generating processes. The use of mixture models, to account for these different flood generating processes, are investigated for catchments in Norway. For the case of annual maximum series (AMS), a two-component mixture of Gumbel distributions is fitted, by assuming that the mixture weights are both known and unknown. Subsequently, for peaks over threshold (POT) series a two-component mixture of exponential distributions is considered. Again, the two cases of known and unknown mixture weights are studied. When assuming that the mixture weights are known, these are given by the precalculated proportion of rainfall and snowmelt contributing to each flood value. The mixture models are compared to the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution and the Gumbel distribution for AMS, and to the generalized Pareto (GP) distribution and the exponential distribution for POT. Maximum likehood is used for parameter estimation, and for the mixture models with unknown weights the maximum likehood estimates are obtained by the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. The predictive performance of the models are compared using various scoring rules. In addition, the stability of the models are compared. We found that although the scoring rules are not always able to differentiate between the models, the Gumbel distribution and the exponential distribution, for the case of AMS and POT respectively, often give the most reliable and stable estimates. The mixture models estimated by the EM algorithm occasionally give unexpected results and seems unfit for practical use in FFA.
Publisher
NTNU

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit