Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOpstad, Leiv Trygve
dc.contributor.authorFallan, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-21T13:45:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-01T08:13:13Z
dc.date.available2016-11-21T13:45:58Z
dc.date.available2017-02-01T08:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Higher Education 2016, 5(3):32-45nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1927-6052
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2429095
dc.description.abstractThe present study examines the self-efficacy levels and self-efficacy strength for male and female students in a course in Principle of Economics. The groups of male and female students may be mutually heterogeneous when it comes to personality types in a business school (Fallan & Opstad, 2014). This study does not treat the gender groups as internally homogeneous and examines how gender and gender-personality interactions separately affect self-efficacy. The participants are students enrolled at Trondheim Business School, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. These students have answered a questionnaires based on Meyer-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and questions about their perceived self-efficacy in Principles of Economics. The study reveals that female students have significantly lower self-efficacy level and self-efficacy strength than their male peers. However, this general conclusion does not hold for all gender-personality types. Lower self-efficacy level in economics for female students compared to those of their male peers does only exist for female intuition and feeling (NF) and intuition and thinking students (NT), not for the female sensing and perceiving student (SP). Furthermore, higher self-efficacy level for male students does only exist for male intuition and thinking students (NT) and not for male NF and SP students. Female students have significantly lower self-efficacy strength than their male peers as well. However, this does only exist for female intuition and thinking (NT) and sensing and perceiving (SP) students, but not for female NF students. The general result that male students have significantly higher self-efficacy strength than their female peers does only encompass male intuition and thinking (NT) students and not the male SP and NF students. The main contributions of this study are showing the need to go beyond gender to get a more complete picture of the differences in self-efficacy between female and male students. We should be cautions to conclude that self-efficacy is uniformly affected by gender. Gender-personality interactions do matter.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSciedu Pressnb_NO
dc.subjectSelf-efficacy, Gender differences, Gender-personality interactions, Economicsnb_NO
dc.titleStudent Self-Efficacy and Gender-Personality Interactionsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2016-11-21T13:45:58Z
dc.source.pagenumber32-45nb_NO
dc.source.volume5nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Higher Educationnb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p32
dc.identifier.cristin1402462
dc.description.localcodeThis journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel