Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFedorov, Semyon
dc.contributor.authorHagspiel-Janssen, Verena
dc.contributor.authorRogstad, Richard Wilhelm Hammerstad
dc.contributor.authorHaseldonckx, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorHaugsgjerd, Johannes H
dc.contributor.authorRønning, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T07:58:43Z
dc.date.available2024-08-08T07:58:43Z
dc.date.created2024-02-23T08:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Economics. 2024, 131 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145268
dc.description.abstractThe average size of new oil discoveries on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) is steadily decreasing. As standalone developments are often not economically viable for marginal fields, tiebacks to existing production facilities are considered in many cases. At the same time, many production facilities in mature production areas have spare capacity due to depleted reservoirs. In this paper we evaluate tieback development concepts for a marginal field having the choice between two hosts with different characteristics. We develop a model that allows to (1) evaluate the tieback development concepts; (2) determine the optimal choice of host facility for the field operator; and (3) optimize the timing of development taking into account oil, gas price and CAPEX uncertainty using a real options approach. In order to be able to reflect how the capacity constraints of a host affects the production potential of the field over time, we incorporate a production optimization model as part of the methodology. We apply the model to a real case on the NCS. We identify characteristics that drive the optimal choice of hosts. Specifically, we show how lifetime extension, reduction of CAPEX and additional spare capacity individually and in combination affect the competitiveness of one host over another therewith, providing valuable insight for tariff negotiations and portfolio planning. Apart from that we find that timing flexibility is of high importance in case of high downside risk. This makes our approach particularly relevant for marginal oil field development which are often characterized by prominent uncertainties.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEvaluation of tieback developments for marginal oil fields with timing flexibilityen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of tieback developments for marginal oil fields with timing flexibilityen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume131en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107344
dc.identifier.cristin2249004
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal