Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMilburn, Evelyn Arko
dc.contributor.authorVulchanova, Mila Dimitrova
dc.contributor.authorVulchanov, Valentin
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T08:16:22Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T08:16:22Z
dc.date.created2021-03-26T09:58:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCanadian journal of experimental psychology. 2021, 75 (2), 169-174.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1196-1961
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3137621
dc.description.abstractMultiword expressions have attracted attention recently following suggestions that they are acquired chunk-wise by children in the first language, while adults learning a second language may focus more on individual words within an expression. This is of particular interest for the acquisition of idioms, which are multiword expressions in which the literal meanings of the component words do not (always) directly contribute to overall phrasal meaning, resulting in a figurative interpretation. Figurative meaning access is speeded both by idiom-internal characteristics, like higher collocational frequency, and idiom-external characteristics, like supportive contexts. We examined the relationship between the collocational frequency of idioms’ component words and the context in which an idiom is embedded. In a visual world eye-tracking study, advanced nonnative English speakers heard incomplete English phrases embedded within contexts that biased either literal or idiomatic continuations and saw images representing literal or figurative completions, or distractor images. Participants showed higher looks to figurative completions that were at odds with contextual bias, suggesting that integrating frequency information in context in adult L2 users may be overridden when a phrase is figurative. However, higher-proficiency participants showed more successful suppression of inappropriate figurative continuations. These results suggest that idiom conventionality when compared to literal phrases may be a stronger driver of predictive looks than collocational frequency or contextual bias alone, and that sensitivity to contextual fit when processing idioms may still be developing even among very advanced L2 users.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA)en_US
dc.titleCollocational frequency and context effects on idiom processing in advanced L2 speakersen_US
dc.title.alternativeCollocational frequency and context effects on idiom processing in advanced L2 speakersen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber169-174en_US
dc.source.volume75en_US
dc.source.journalCanadian journal of experimental psychologyen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/cep0000214
dc.identifier.cristin1901239
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record