dc.contributor.advisor | Hove, Jon Olav | |
dc.contributor.author | Haukøya, Alfred Maximillian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-27T17:21:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-27T17:21:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier | no.ntnu:inspera:187809253:97309853 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3136395 | |
dc.description.abstract | Oppgaven tar for seg proveniensprinsippet innen arkivteori. Proveniensprinsippet handler om å ikke blande arkivmateriale sammen etter sin dannelse. Prinsippet er delt i to sider, ytre proveniens og indre proveniens. I arkivteori blir proveniensprinsippet sett på som et statisk prinsipp for å bedre effektivitet i arkivyrket, i praksis byr proveniensprinsippet på både utfordringer, samtidig som fordeler. Teksten utforsker hvordan proveniensprinsippet blir oppfattet og utført i arkivpraksis, sammenlignet med hvordan prinsippet blir beskrevet i litteratur om arkivteori. | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis deals with the principle of provenance within archival theory. The principle of provenance is about not mixing archival material together after its creation. The principle is dividied into two sides, external provenance and internal provenance. In archival theory, the principle of provenance is seen as a static principle to help improve efficiency in the archival profession, in practice the principle offers both challenges and advantages. This text explores how the principle of provenance is perceived and carried out in archival practice, compared to how the principle is described in literature on archival theory. | |
dc.language | nob | |
dc.publisher | NTNU | |
dc.title | Det er ikke samsvar mellom kart og terreng | |
dc.type | Bachelor thesis | |