Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBesnier, Elodie Anne Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorKotzias, Virginia Irene
dc.contributor.authorHlabana, Thandie
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Kathryn Christine
dc.contributor.authorSieu, Celine
dc.contributor.authorMuthengi, Kimanzi
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T12:13:18Z
dc.date.available2024-06-21T12:13:18Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T15:58:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationHealth Policy and Planning. 2024, 39 (2), 138-155.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-1080
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3135343
dc.description.abstractDespite their growing popularity, little is known about how cash transfers (CTs) can affect health equity in targeted communities. Lesotho’s Child Grants Programme (CGP) is an unconditional CT targeting poor and vulnerable households with children. Started in 2009, the CGP is one of Lesotho’s key programmes in developing the country’s social protection system. Using the CGP’s early phases as a case study, this research aims to capture how programme stakeholders understood and operationalized the concept of health equity in Lesotho’s CGP. The qualitative analysis relied on the triangulation of findings from a desk review and semi-structured key informant interviews with programme stakeholders. The programme documents were coded deductively and the interview transcripts inductively. Both materials were analysed thematically before triangulating their findings. We explored determining factors for differences or disagreements within a theme according to the programme’s chronology, the stakeholders’ affiliations and their role(s) in the CGP. The definitions of health equity in the context of the CGP reflected an awareness among stakeholders of these issues and their determinants but also the challenges raised by the complex (or even debated) nature of the concept. The most common definition of this concept focused on children’s access to health services for the most disadvantaged households, suggesting a narrow, targeted approach to health equity as targeting disadvantages. Yet, even the most common definition of this concept was not fully translated into the programme, especially in the day-to-day operations and reporting at the local level. This operationalization gap affected the study of selected health spillover effects of the CGP on health equity and might have undermined other programme impacts related to specific health disadvantages or gaps. As equity objectives become more prominent in CTs, understanding their meaning and translation into concrete, observable and measurable applications in programmes are essential to support impact.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleExploring health equity in Lesotho’s Child Grants Programmeen_US
dc.title.alternativeExploring health equity in Lesotho’s Child Grants Programmeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber138-155en_US
dc.source.volume39en_US
dc.source.journalHealth Policy and Planningen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czad116
dc.identifier.cristin2224139
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal