Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBjørnelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler
dc.contributor.authorAas, Eline
dc.contributor.authorAaltonen, Mari
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Terje P.
dc.contributor.authorThoresen, Lisbeth
dc.contributor.authorForma, Leena
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T11:12:26Z
dc.date.available2024-05-30T11:12:26Z
dc.date.created2024-05-29T13:45:19Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2224-5820
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3131989
dc.description.abstractBackground: Time at home at end-of-life is perceived as valuable to individuals. Increasing home care is therefore often a political goal. Yet, little is known about where individuals live towards their end-of-life. Our aim was to describe where individuals reside their last 6 months of life in Finland and Norway, and how this differed by cause of death, sex, age, marital status, and income. Methods: We used individual-leveled national registry data on all decedents aged >70 years in 2009–2013 to describe the number of days individuals spent at home, in hospital, in long-term care (LTC) and short-term care (STC) facilities. We described the place of residence for all and by causes of death: cancer, diseases of the circulatory system, disease in the respiratory system, and mental and behavioral disorders (primarily dementia). We analyzed how age, marital status (indicating informal care), and income associated with place of residence. Analyses were stratified by sex and country. Results: During the last 6 months of life, decedents in Finland (n=186,017) and Norway (n=159,756) spent similar amounts of days in hospital (8 and 11 days) and in STC facilities (15 and 13 days). Finnish decedents spent more days at home (96 vs. 84 days) and fewer days in LTC facilities (64 vs. 80 days). Living arrangement differed similarly by cause of death in the two countries, e.g., decedents from cancer and mental and behavioral disorders spent 123 [113] vs. 29 [21] days at home in Finland (Norway). In both countries, for all causes of death, lower age and marital status were associated with more days at home, for both males and females. While those with higher income spent more days at home in Norway, the opposite was found in Finland. Conclusions: Older individual’s living arrangements in the last 6 months of life were similar in Finland and Norway but differed by cause of death. Younger individuals and those with access to informal care spent more days at home, compared to their counterparts. With aging populations, more individuals will likely need LTC at their end of life. Policies should align with these needs when developing future health care services.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAME Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePlace of living at end-of-life according to cause of death: a comparative analysis of all decedents 70 years or older in 2009-2013 in Finland and Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativePlace of living at end-of-life according to cause of death: a comparative analysis of all decedents 70 years or older in 2009-2013 in Finland and Norwayen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalAnnals of Palliative Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/apm-23-269
dc.identifier.cristin2271776
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode0


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal