| dc.description.abstract | This thesis aims to provide solutions to enhance the sustainability of cabin construction in Norway with a focus on a case study named Åneggagranda, which is a pilot cabin project built in Oppdal, Norway by Nasjonalparken Næringshage. It also examines the individual emissions budget for Norwegians until 2030 in line with the Paris Agreement's target to reduce emissions by 43% as part of a larger goal of achieving zero emissions by 2050. Additionally, it assesses the contribution of cabin ownership to this budget, exploring whether cabins adhere to low-emission standards such as FutureBuilt ZERO and align with broader goals, such as the Paris Agreement. Using a mixed methods approach, data for the Ånegga cabin case study were obtained from Nasjonalparken, and in instances where data were unavailable, certain assumptions were made based on Sintef prefabricated construction systems for cabins. The study involved a site visit, an interview with the constructor, and the utilization of Reduzer software for main Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) calculations, while Rhino software and its Grasshopper plugin were used for energy analysis. This study underscores the substantial influence of occupancy patterns on building energy demand and operational emissions, particularly emphasizing the impact of shorter occupancy periods during colder seasons. Managing the frequency and duration of cabin use emerges as a crucial factor in enhancing energy efficiency and reducing building emissions. The research also highlights the potential of adjusting standby temperatures, proposing a practical recommendation for maintaining user comfort while minimizing heating loads. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of considering grid emissions during the design phase and explores the benefits of material reuse, solar panel integration, and individual choices in achieving sustainable construction practices. The Ånegga case study, while showing emissions below FutureBuilt Zero benchmarks, raises questions about their adequacy in meeting global reduction targets, emphasizing the importance of individual decisions on the generated GWP and fostering a collective commitment to practical and technological solutions for a more sustainable future. | |
