Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGodara, Nitesh
dc.contributor.authorBruland, Oddbjørn
dc.contributor.authorAlfredsen, Knut Tore
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T09:14:41Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T09:14:41Z
dc.date.created2024-04-16T15:30:24Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2624-9375
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3129392
dc.description.abstractIn this study, two hydrodynamic models, TELEMAC-2D and HEC-RAS 2D, were compared for their Rain-on-Grid (RoG) technique with a particular focus on runoff generation processes in a small and steep catchment. Curve number (CN) method was applied in both the models to simulate two single storm events up to 20 h of duration, whereas the Green-Ampt Redistribution (GAR) method was additionally applied in HEC-RAS 2D for a multi-peak flood event with sustained flow between the peaks. CN and GAR methods were compared for this flood event, and a sensitivity analysis of the GAR parameters was also done. Moreover, the two models were compared for their calibration process, computational time, mesh size and shape, and model availability, in general, as well as the results including inundated areas, water depth, and velocity. The results indicate that both the models are capable of reproducing short duration single storm floods. NSE and R2 for both models ranged from 0.70 to 0.90 and from 0.93 to 0.95. However, the models struggled to reproduce the long- duration multi-peak flood event. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results are not very sensitive to the two GAR parameters which are responsible to influence the flow of the second peak in the flood event. Neither the CN nor the GAR infiltration method successfully replicated such events because the hydraulic models permanently lose infiltrated water from the domain. The returned sub-surface flow significantly contributes to river flow during these flood events; however, none of the model incorporates a return flow algorithm.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of two hydrodynamic models for their rain-on-grid technique to simulate flash floods in steep catchmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeComparison of two hydrodynamic models for their rain-on-grid technique to simulate flash floods in steep catchmenten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in wateren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/frwa.2024.1384205
dc.identifier.cristin2262143
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal