Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHeitmann, Odin
dc.contributor.authorFranke, Katrin
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T06:53:52Z
dc.date.available2024-04-10T06:53:52Z
dc.date.created2023-11-28T13:37:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1892-0713
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3125648
dc.description.abstractIn today’s world of cybersecurity, it is not a question of whether an organization will experience a cyber attack, but rather a matter of when it will happen. These incidents can cause significant disruption and financial losses to organizations. Forensic readiness is becoming increasingly crucial as it can help maximize the use of digital evidence and reduce the investigative cost after an attack. It can also aid law enforcement in identifying and prosecuting cybercrime perpetrators. Our observation of cybercrime investigations indicates divergent stakeholder priorities during a cyber attack. Victimized organizations prioritize resuming normal operations, and incident responders focus on restoration, potentially neglecting criminal evidence integrity. Law enforcement involvement occurs post-incident, usually after the initial incident handling is completed. Due to divergent focus areas, there is a lack of a comprehensive overview. This made us question the relationship between forensic readiness practices in the industry and criminal investigations performed by law enforcement after an attack. This paper investigates whether forensic readiness and criminal investigation are aligned. To assess alignment, we compare forensic readiness and criminal investigation definitions and their core components. Our research shows that forensic readiness does not sufficiently focus on criminal investigation; thus, the current forensic readiness approach does not adequately encompass criminal investigations. We propose incorporating criminal investigation integration as a new domain to address this issue while developing future forensic readiness models and practices. Furthermore, we propose using the term cross-organizational investigative readiness instead of forensic readiness to underline the importance of the industry, incident responders, and law enforcement working together to prevent, mitigate, and prosecute cybercrime.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBibsys Open Journal Systemsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleExploring Digital Forensic Readiness: A Preliminary Study from a Law Enforcement Perspectiveen_US
dc.title.alternativeExploring Digital Forensic Readiness: A Preliminary Study from a Law Enforcement Perspectiveen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalNIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanningen_US
dc.identifier.cristin2203944
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal