Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSteen, Natalie Anne
dc.contributor.authorKrokstad, Steinar
dc.contributor.authorTorske, Magnhild Oust
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T09:13:29Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T09:13:29Z
dc.date.created2023-06-29T17:38:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Agromedicine. 2023, 28 (4), 809-820.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-924X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3123293
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Obtain a broad impression of the health and wellbeing of working farmers in a representative population. Methods: A cross-sectional study using data from a large, general population-based survey, The HUNT Study, Norway (HUNT survey 4, 2017–2019, response rate 54%). The study included 24,313 occupationally active participants aged 19 to 76 years, including 1,188 farmers. Prevalences are estimated for outcomes covering musculoskeletal, respiratory, and mental health as well as general health and life satisfaction, with adjustment for worker age and sex. The estimates for farmers are compared to skilled white collar workers and skilled manual workers. Results: Farmers had a higher estimated prevalence of poor overall health (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.56 [95%CI 1.34,1.82]), chronically impaired mobility (PR 1.83 [1.53, 2.20]), long-standing musculoskeletal pain or stiffness (PR 1.29 [1.21, 1.37]), work-related respiratory attack (PR 4.32 [3.67, 5.08]), depression symptoms (PR 1.30 [1.04, 1.61]) and symptoms of psychological distress (PR 1.23 [1.04, 1.47]) than skilled white collar workers. The estimated prevalence of poor overall health (PR 1.19 [1.00, 1.41]) and work-related respiratory attacks (PR 1.44 [1.24, 1.67]) was also higher for farmers than skilled manual workers, after adjustment for age and sex. Farmers had greater odds of rating themselves less satisfied with life in general than skilled white collar workers (adjusted OR 1.17 [1.04, 1.31]). Conclusions: These results are consistent with previous research and add evidence that farm work is associated with high prevalences of a broad range of adverse health outcomes. The associations with chronically impaired mobility, long-standing musculoskeletal pain, and poor self-rated health were strong. The adjusted PRs for work-related respiratory attacks relative to both comparison groups were particularly high. More research is needed to identify and evaluate interventions that can improve farmer health.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHaworth Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Cross-Sectional Study of Farmer Health and Wellbeing in Norway: The HUNT Study (2017-2019)en_US
dc.title.alternativeA Cross-Sectional Study of Farmer Health and Wellbeing in Norway: The HUNT Study (2017-2019)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber809-820en_US
dc.source.volume28en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Agromedicineen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1059924X.2023.2229840
dc.identifier.cristin2159618
dc.relation.projectForskningsmidlene for jordbruk og matindustri: 319766en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal