Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHosar, Rannei
dc.contributor.authorSteinsbekk, Aslak Irgens
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-28T15:05:51Z
dc.date.available2024-02-28T15:05:51Z
dc.date.created2023-09-19T17:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3120353
dc.description.abstractObjective - Investigate the association between Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) risk scores and low scores in self-reported outcome measures (SROMs) among individuals with complex or long-term conditions. Design - Longitudinal study using five ACG risk scores based on diagnoses from general practitioner (GP) visits in 1 year and responses to a survey including three SROMs 4 months later. Setting - Four adjacent municipalities in Central Norway. Participants - Non-institutionalised individuals ≥18 years with ≥1 diagnosis code indicating a complex or long-term condition, ≥1 visit to a GP, and who participated in the survey (n=2944). Measures - Dependent variables were low scores in the three SROMs (threshold for being defined as a low score in parentheses): Patient Activation Measure (level 1–2), EQ-5D (<0.4) or self-rated health (‘Poor’). Independent variables were five ACG variables. Results - The individuals with the lowest scores in the three SROMs were mostly three separate groups. The lowest Patient Activation Measure scores were associated with high scores in the ACG variables unscaled total cost predicted risk (adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 1.80) and positive frailty flag (adjOR 1.76). The lowest EQ-5D scores were associated with high scores in the ACG variables unscaled concurrent risk (adjOR 1.60) and probability persistent high user scores (adjOR 2.83). The lowest self-rated health scores were associated with high scores in the ACG variable unscaled concurrent risk scores (adjOR 1.77), unscaled total cost predicted risk scores (adjOR 2.14) and receiving a positive frailty flag (adjOR 1.82). Conclusions - There were associations between ACG risk scores and subsequent low SROM scores. This suggests a potential to use diagnosis-based risk stratification systems as a proxy for SROMs to identify individuals with complex or long-term conditions for person-centred healthcare intervention.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAssociation between Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups risk scores and self-reported outcome measures: an observational study among individuals with complex or long-term conditions in Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativeAssociation between Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups risk scores and self-reported outcome measures: an observational study among individuals with complex or long-term conditions in Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071071
dc.identifier.cristin2176719
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal