Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorØvrebotten, Tarjei
dc.contributor.authorHeck, Siri Lagethon
dc.contributor.authorSkjørten, Ingunn
dc.contributor.authorEinvik, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorStavem, Knut
dc.contributor.authorIngul, Charlotte Ingeborg Björk
dc.contributor.authorOmland, Torbjørn
dc.contributor.authorMyhre, Peder Langeland
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T14:52:03Z
dc.date.available2024-02-01T14:52:03Z
dc.date.created2023-09-15T12:17:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCardiology. 2023, 148 (4), 300-306.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-6312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3115123
dc.description.abstractBackground: Myocardial scars detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging after COVID-19 have caused concerns regarding potential long-term cardiovascular consequences. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate cardiopulmonary functioning in patients with versus without COVID-19-related myocardial scars. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, CMR was performed approximately 6 months after moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Before (∼3 months post-COVID-19) and after (∼12 months post-COVID-19) the CMR, patients underwent extensive cardiopulmonary testing with cardiopulmonary exercise tests, 24-h ECG, and echocardiography. We excluded participants with overt heart failure. Results: Post-COVID-19 CMR was available in 49 patients with cardiopulmonary tests at 3 and 12 months after the index hospitalization. Nine (18%) patients had small late gadolinium enhancement-detected myocardial scars. Patients with myocardial scars were older (63.2 ± 13.2 vs. 56.2 ± 13.2 years) and more frequently men (89% vs. 55%) compared to those without scars. Cardiorespiratory fitness was similar in patients with and without scars, i.e., peak oxygen uptake: 82.1 ± 11.5% versus 76.3 ± 22.5% of predicted, respectively (p = 0.46). The prevalence of ventricular premature contractions and arrhythmias was low and not different by the presence of myocardial scar. Cardiac structure and function assessed by echocardiography were similar between the groups, except for a tendency of greater left ventricular mass in those with scars (75 ± 20 vs. 62 ± 14, p = 0.02 and p = 0.08 after adjusting for age and sex). There were no significant associations between myocardial scar and longitudinal changes in cardiopulmonary function from 3 to 12 months. Conclusion: Our findings imply that the presence of minor myocardial scars has limited clinical significance with respect to cardiopulmonary function after COVID-19.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMinor Myocardial Scars in Association with Cardiopulmonary Function after COVID-19en_US
dc.title.alternativeMinor Myocardial Scars in Association with Cardiopulmonary Function after COVID-19en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber300-306en_US
dc.source.volume148en_US
dc.source.journalCardiologyen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000530942
dc.identifier.cristin2175463
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal