Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSzlavi, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGuedes, Leandro
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T06:45:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T06:45:29Z
dc.date.created2023-08-01T14:29:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationLecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). 2023, 14030 343-354.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0302-9743
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3113964
dc.description.abstractThe importance of inclusivity as a value in our social contexts is increasing; thus, it is not unusual that the software industry has started to embrace it. The need for such a consideration stems from the fact that the composition of the IT sector, especially of positions responsible for decision-making and the design of tools, reflects a workforce that is not diverse enough. This can result in blind spots in the design process, leading to exclusionary user experiences. Therefore, the idea of inclusive design is gaining more prevalence; in fact, it is becoming a general expectation to create software that is useful for and used by more people. With a focus on intersectionality - the understanding that social and digital difficulties result from a complex web of overlapping factors - inclusive user experience seeks to actively and consciously integrate minority, vulnerable, and understudied user groups in the design. UX that is based on inclusive design aims to overcome social disadvantages in all of their intersectional complexities arising from gender, sexual orientation, age, education, dis/ability, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity, among others. At the same time, it must be acknowledged that gender-inclusive design has challenges and limitations: the idea of gender inclusion in design is not yet a reality. Our research investigates academic literature, as well as tech industry practices, like the websites of Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Meta. We aim to understand how inclusive design is theorized and implemented nowadays. Our analysis shows that intersectionality suffers even when inclusivity is intended to be taken into consideration. We also offer guidelines for factors that might be explored for a more inclusive design. Our paper’s analysis leaves an opportunity for additional study; the complexity of identities and how disregarding them in software design can exacerbate inequality call for even more investigation and awareness.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.titleGender-Inclusive Design: Case Studies and Guidelinesen_US
dc.title.alternativeGender-Inclusive Design: Case Studies and Guidelinesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber343-354en_US
dc.source.volume14030en_US
dc.source.journalLecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-35699-5_25
dc.identifier.cristin2164297
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record