Semi-supervised anomaly detection methods for leakage identification in water distribution networks: A comparative study

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of 10 state of the art semi-supervised anomaly detection (AD) methods for leakage identification in water distribution networks (WDNs). The performances of the semi-supervised AD methods is evaluated on LeakDB, a benchmark consisting of independent leakage scenarios that also account for the various sources of uncertainties arising in WDNs. Three performance metrics (F Beta Measure, PR AUC Score, and Identification Lag Time) that collectively capture the different facets of leakage identification in WDNs is utilised to measure the efficacy of semi-supervised AD methods. Additionally, the TOPSIS MCDM tool supported with two weighting approaches is implemented to simultaneously consider all performance metrics in ranking the performance of semi-supervised AD methods. The results of this extensive comparative study shows that Local Outlier factor (LOF) is the overall best performing semi-supervised AD method on LeakDB. It is also evident that proximity based semi-supervised AD methods are superior to linear and probabilistic AD methods due to their ability to unearth leak events in the neighbourhood of normal operational data points. Finally, the impact of uncertainties on the performance of the semi-supervised AD models is discussed in addition to general recommendations on the usage of semi-supervised AD methods in leakage identification.

Semi-supervised anomaly detection methods for leakage identification in water distribution networks: A comparative study