Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFossmark, Reidar
dc.contributor.authorNess-Jensen, Eivind
dc.contributor.authorSørdal, Øystein Finset
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T12:10:34Z
dc.date.available2024-01-17T12:10:34Z
dc.date.created2024-01-04T10:24:03Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMC Gastroenterology. 2023, 23 303-303.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-230X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3112157
dc.description.abstractBackground The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has had a marked increase in Western countries with a paralleling interest in extraesophageal (EE) manifestations of GERD, including laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). There are considerable differences in clinical practice between gastroenterologists, otolaryngologists and pulmonologists. Methods In this narrative review we address some of these controversies concerning EE manifestations of GERD and LPR. Results It is disputed whether there is causal relationship between reflux and the numerous symptoms and conditions suggested to be EE manifestations of GERD. Similarly, the pathophysiology is uncertain and there are disagreements concerning diagnostic criteria. Consequently, it is challenging to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations. A significant number of patients are given a trial course with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for several months before symptoms are evaluated. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs PPI treatment does not seem to be advantageous over placebo, and the evidence supporting that patients without verified GERD have any benefit of PPI treatment is negligible. There is a large increase in both over the counter and prescribed PPI use in several countries and a significant proportion of this use is without any symptomatic benefit for the patients. Whereas short-term treatment has few side effects, there is concern about side-effects after long-term use. Although empiric PPI treatment for suspected EE manifestations of GERD instead of prior esophageal 24-hour pH and impedance monitoring is included in several guidelines by various societies, this practice contributes to overtreatment with PPI. Conclusion We argue that the current knowledge suggests that diagnostic testing with pH and impedance monitoring rather than empiric PPI treatment should be chosen in a higher proportion of patients presenting with symptoms possibly attributable to EE reflux.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIs empiric proton pump inhibition in patients with symptoms of extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux justified?en_US
dc.title.alternativeIs empiric proton pump inhibition in patients with symptoms of extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux justified?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber303-303en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12876-023-02945-7
dc.identifier.cristin2220444
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal