Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRindal, Ole Marius Hoel
dc.contributor.authorBjåstad, Tore Grüner
dc.contributor.authorEspeland, Torvald
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Erik Andreas Rye
dc.contributor.authorMåsøy, Svein-Erik
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-14T08:25:32Z
dc.date.available2023-12-14T08:25:32Z
dc.date.created2023-11-10T09:42:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 2023, 70 (10), 1295-1307.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0885-3010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3107500
dc.description.abstractUltrasound image quality is of utmost importance for a clinician to reach a correct diagnosis. Conventionally, image quality is evaluated using metrics to determine the contrast and resolution. These metrics require localization of specific regions and targets in the image such as a region of interest (ROI), a background region, and/or a point scatterer. Such objects can all be difficult to identify in in-vivo images, especially for automatic evaluation of image quality in large amounts of data. Using a matrix array probe, we have recorded a Very Large cardiac Channel data Database (VLCD) to evaluate coherence as an in vivo image quality metric. The VLCD consists of 33280 individual image frames from 538 recordings of 106 patients. We also introduce a global image coherence (GIC), an in vivo image quality metric that does not require any identified ROI since it is defined as an average coherence value calculated from all the data pixels used to form the image, below a preselected range. The GIC is shown to be a quantitative metric for in vivo image quality when applied to the VLCD. We demonstrate, on a subset of the dataset, that the GIC correlates well with the conventional metrics contrast ratio (CR) and the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) with R = 0.74 ( p<0.005 ) and R = 0.62 ( p<0.005 ), respectively. There exist multiple methods to estimate the coherence of the received signal across the ultrasound array. We further show that all coherence measures investigated in this study are highly correlated ( R> 0.9 and p<0.001 ) when applied to the VLCD. Thus, even though there are differences in the implementation of coherence measures, all quantify the similarity of the signal across the array and can be averaged into a GIC to evaluate image quality automatically and quantitatively.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Very Large Cardiac Channel Data Database (VLCD) Used to Evaluate Global Image Coherence (GIC) as an In Vivo Image Quality Metricen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Very Large Cardiac Channel Data Database (VLCD) Used to Evaluate Global Image Coherence (GIC) as an In Vivo Image Quality Metricen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1295-1307en_US
dc.source.volume70en_US
dc.source.journalIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Controlen_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3308034
dc.identifier.cristin2194914
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal