Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Oddgeir
dc.contributor.authorHeidenreich, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Berit
dc.contributor.authorLamvik, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorSingsaas, Frode Thomassen
dc.contributor.authorZouhar, Yosra
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-27T13:58:28Z
dc.date.available2023-11-27T13:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978‐82‐93602‐34‐7
dc.identifier.issn2535‐5392
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3104829
dc.description.abstractThis literature review identified 2513 articles, and after a screening process we were left with 64 European articles. We found that qualitative methods like literature/document analysis and interviews was used more often than quantitative methods like surveys or combinations of methods in Europe. Most studies were focusing on national or local levels, and most studies (58%) was published after 2016.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorwegian Research Centre for Hydropower Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHydroCen Rapport;33
dc.title“Gold Standard” for mitigating environmental impacts: Summary of literature reviewen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Norwegian Research Centre for Hydropower Technology (HydroCen) 2023 Publikasjonen kan siteres fritt med kildeangivelseen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record