Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCheema, Sanjay
dc.contributor.authorStubberud, Anker
dc.contributor.authorRantell, Khadija
dc.contributor.authorNachev, Parashkev
dc.contributor.authorTronvik, Erling Andreas
dc.contributor.authorMatharu, Manjit
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-13T13:41:39Z
dc.date.available2023-11-13T13:41:39Z
dc.date.created2023-09-04T10:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Headache and Pain. 2023, 24 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1129-2369
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3102217
dc.description.abstractBackground It is unknown whether new daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a single disorder or heterogenous group of disorders, and whether it is a unique disorder from chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. We describe a large group of patients with primary NDPH, compare its phenotype to transformed chronic daily headache (T-CDH), and use cluster analysis to reveal potential sub-phenotypes in the NDPH group. Methods We performed a case–control study using prospectively collected clinical data in patients with primary NDPH and T-CDH (encompassing chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache). We used logistic regression with propensity score matching to compare demographics, phenotype, comorbidities, and treatment responses between NDPH and T-CDH. We used K-means cluster analysis with Gower distance to identify sub-clusters in the NDPH group based on a combination of demographics, phenotype, and comorbidities. Results We identified 366 patients with NDPH and 696 with T-CDH who met inclusion criteria. Patients with NDPH were less likely to be female (62.6% vs. 73.3%, p < 0.001). Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, motion sensitivity, vertigo, and cranial autonomic symptoms were all significantly less frequent in NDPH than T-CDH (p value for all < 0.001). Acute treatments appeared less effective in NDPH than T-CDH, and medication overuse was less common (16% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Response to most classes of oral preventive treatments was poor in both groups. The most effective treatment in NDPH was doselupin in 45.7% patients (95% CI 34.8–56.5%). Cluster analysis identified three subgroups of NDPH. Cluster 1 was older, had a high proportion of male patients, and less severe headaches. Cluster 2 was predominantly female, had severe headaches, and few associated symptoms. Cluster 3 was predominantly female with a high prevalence of migrainous symptoms and headache triggers. Conclusions Whilst there is overlap in the phenotype of NDPH and T-CDH, the differences in migrainous, cranial autonomic symptoms, and vulnerability to medication overuse suggest that they are not the same disorder. NDPH may be fractionated into three sub-phenotypes, which require further investigation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePhenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headacheen_US
dc.title.alternativePhenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headacheen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume24en_US
dc.source.journalThe Journal of Headache and Painen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s10194-023-01639-5
dc.identifier.cristin2172002
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal