Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCheema, Sanjay
dc.contributor.authorStubberud, Anker
dc.contributor.authorRantell, Khadija
dc.contributor.authorNachev, Parashkev
dc.contributor.authorTronvik, Erling Andreas
dc.contributor.authorMatharu, Manjit
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-13T13:41:39Z
dc.date.available2023-11-13T13:41:39Z
dc.date.created2023-09-04T10:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Headache and Pain. 2023, 24 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1129-2369
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3102217
dc.description.abstractBackground It is unknown whether new daily persistent headache (NDPH) is a single disorder or heterogenous group of disorders, and whether it is a unique disorder from chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache. We describe a large group of patients with primary NDPH, compare its phenotype to transformed chronic daily headache (T-CDH), and use cluster analysis to reveal potential sub-phenotypes in the NDPH group. Methods We performed a case–control study using prospectively collected clinical data in patients with primary NDPH and T-CDH (encompassing chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache). We used logistic regression with propensity score matching to compare demographics, phenotype, comorbidities, and treatment responses between NDPH and T-CDH. We used K-means cluster analysis with Gower distance to identify sub-clusters in the NDPH group based on a combination of demographics, phenotype, and comorbidities. Results We identified 366 patients with NDPH and 696 with T-CDH who met inclusion criteria. Patients with NDPH were less likely to be female (62.6% vs. 73.3%, p < 0.001). Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, motion sensitivity, vertigo, and cranial autonomic symptoms were all significantly less frequent in NDPH than T-CDH (p value for all < 0.001). Acute treatments appeared less effective in NDPH than T-CDH, and medication overuse was less common (16% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Response to most classes of oral preventive treatments was poor in both groups. The most effective treatment in NDPH was doselupin in 45.7% patients (95% CI 34.8–56.5%). Cluster analysis identified three subgroups of NDPH. Cluster 1 was older, had a high proportion of male patients, and less severe headaches. Cluster 2 was predominantly female, had severe headaches, and few associated symptoms. Cluster 3 was predominantly female with a high prevalence of migrainous symptoms and headache triggers. Conclusions Whilst there is overlap in the phenotype of NDPH and T-CDH, the differences in migrainous, cranial autonomic symptoms, and vulnerability to medication overuse suggest that they are not the same disorder. NDPH may be fractionated into three sub-phenotypes, which require further investigation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePhenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headacheen_US
dc.title.alternativePhenotype of new daily persistent headache: subtypes and comparison to transformed chronic daily headacheen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume24en_US
dc.source.journalThe Journal of Headache and Painen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s10194-023-01639-5
dc.identifier.cristin2172002
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal