Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWilde, Lukas R.A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T14:14:40Z
dc.date.available2023-10-18T14:14:40Z
dc.date.created2023-10-17T12:26:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationIMAGE: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Image Sciences. 2023, 37 (1), 6-33.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2362-4981
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097331
dc.description.abstractThis introduction to the collection “Generative Imagery: Towards a ‘New Paradigm’ of Machine Learning-Based Image Production” discusses whether – or to what respect – generative imagery represents a new paradigm for image production; and if that constitutes even a novel media form and an emerging research field. Specifically, it asks what a humanities approach to machine learning-based image generation could look like and which questions disciplines like media studies will be tasked to ask in the future. The essay first focuses on continuities and connections rather than on alleged radical shifts in media history. It then highlights some salient differences of generative imagery – not only in contrast to photography or painting but specifically to earlier forms of computer-generated imagery. Postulating a ‘new paradigm’ will thus be based 1) on generative imagery’s emergent or stochastic features, 2) on two interrelated, but often competing entanglements of immediacy-oriented and hypermediacy-oriented forms of realisms, and 3) on a new text-image-relation built on the approximation of ‘natural’, meaning here human rather than machine code-based language. The survey closes with some reflections about the conditions under which to address this imagery as a distinct media (form), instead of ‘merely’ as a new technology. The proposal it makes is to address generative imagery as a form of mediation within evolving dispositifs, assemblages, or socio-technological configurations of image generation that reconfigure the distribution of agency and subject positions within contemporary media cultures – especially between human and non-human (technological as well as institutional) actors. Of special importance to identify any (cultural) distinctness of generative imagery will thus be a praxeological perceptive on the establishment, attribution, and negotiation of cultural ‘protocols’ (conventionalized practices and typical use cases), within already existing media forms as well as across and beyond themen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHerbert von Halem Verlagen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleGenerative Imagery as Media Form and Research Field: Introduction to a New Paradigmen_US
dc.title.alternativeGenerative Imagery as Media Form and Research Field: Introduction to a New Paradigmen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber6-33en_US
dc.source.volume37en_US
dc.source.journalIMAGE: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Image Sciencesen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1453/1614-0885-1-2023-15446
dc.identifier.cristin2185530
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal