Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCorreia, José
dc.contributor.authorMourão, António
dc.contributor.authorXin, Haohui
dc.contributor.authorDe Jesus, Abílio
dc.contributor.authorBittencourt, Túlio
dc.contributor.authorCalçada, Rui
dc.contributor.authorBerto, Filippo
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T07:44:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-21T07:44:00Z
dc.date.created2023-03-31T12:47:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Materials Research and Technology (JMR&T). 2023, 23 3257-3271.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2238-7854
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3090999
dc.description.abstractWith the increasing attention on structural reliability and integrity, the probabilistic fatigue behaviour of riveted joints is drawn more attention, more specifically in the influence that this may have on the fatigue damage accumulation evaluation of structural components. For that, in this paper, the parameters of S–N curves for two riveted joints were obtained using the least-squares regression (LR) and the orthogonal regression (OR) methods, respectively. The results showed that the fitted slope B from the OR method is larger than the one from the LR method of all specimens. The probabilistic fatigue life of the riveted joints is obtained by Castillo & Fernández-Canteli (CFC) method and stochastic analysis using Latin hypercube sampling strategies. Among six different probabilistic functions, the stochastic analysis with the Gumbel distribution contributed to the largest fatigue strength with 95% and 99% confidence levels while the stochastic analysis with the Weibull distribution led to the smallest fatigue strength with 95% and 99% confidence levels. The effects of regression methods on the probabilistic fatigue life are not obvious, however, for the levels of stress range of the high-cycle regime, the fatigue life is substantially different when the comparison is made between the curves obtained by different approaches, which will have implications in the assessment of the fatigue damage accumulation of structural joints operating in this fatigue regimes. The fatigue strength with 95% and 99% confidence levels obtained using constant exponent are larger than when employing the varied exponent. The probabilistic fatigue life with stochastic analysis using constant exponent is closer to the CFC model than by using varied constant.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B. V.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleFatigue strength assessment of riveted railway bridge details based on regression analyses combined with probabilistic modelsen_US
dc.title.alternativeFatigue strength assessment of riveted railway bridge details based on regression analyses combined with probabilistic modelsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber3257-3271en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Materials Research and Technology (JMR&T)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.193
dc.identifier.cristin2138859
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal