Ideological biases in research evaluations? The case of research on majority–minority relations
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3063694Utgivelsesdato
2022Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Sammendrag
Social science researchers tend to express left-liberal political attitudes. The ideological skew might influence research evaluations, but empirical evidence is limited. We conducted a survey experiment where Norwegian researchers evaluated fictitious research on majority–minority relations. Within this field, social contact and conflict theories emphasize different aspects of majority–minority relations, where the former has a left-liberal leaning in its assumptions and implications. We randomized the conclusion of the research they evaluated so that the research supported one of the two perspectives. Although the research designs are the same, those receiving the social contact conclusion evaluate the quality and relevance of the design more favorably. We do not find similar differences in evaluations of a study on a nonpoliticized topic. Ideological biases in research evaluations? The case of research on majority–minority relations