Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Alphen, Henk-Jan
dc.contributor.authorStrehl, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorVollmer, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorInterwies, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Anasha
dc.contributor.authorGörlitz, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorLocatelli, Luca
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Puentes, Montse
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Hidalga, Maria
dc.contributor.authorGiannakis, Elias
dc.contributor.authorSpek, Teun
dc.contributor.authorScheibel, Marc
dc.contributor.authorKristvik, Erle
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorBergsma, Emmy
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-23T12:38:12Z
dc.date.available2023-02-23T12:38:12Z
dc.date.created2021-12-20T10:34:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2021, 21 (7), 2145-2161.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1561-8633
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053608
dc.description.abstractAs Europe is faced with increasing droughts and extreme precipitation, countries are taking measures to adapt to these changes. It is challenging, however, to navigate through the wide range of possible measures, taking into account the efficacy, economic impact and social justice aspects of these measures, as well as the governance requirements for implementing them. This article presents the approach of selecting and analysing adaptation measures to increasing extreme weather events caused by ongoing climate change that was developed and applied in the H2020 project BINGO (Bringing Innovation to Ongoing Water Management). The purpose of this project is (a) to develop an integrated participatory approach for selecting and evaluating adaptation measures, (b) to apply and evaluate the approach across six case-study river basins across Europe, and (c) to support decision-making towards adaptation capturing the diversity, the different circumstances and challenges river basins face across Europe. It combines three analyses: governance, socio-economic and social justice The governance analysis focuses on the requirements associated with the measures and the extent to which these requirements are met at the research sites. The socio-economic impact focuses on the efficacy of the measures in reducing the risks and the broad range of tools available to compare the measures on their societal impact. Finally, a tentative social justice analysis focuses on the distributive impacts of the adaptation measures. In the summary of results, we give an overview of the outcome of the different analyses. In the conclusion, we briefly assess the main pros and cons of the different analyses that were conducted. The main conclusion is that although the research sites were very different in both the challenges and the institutional context, the approach presented here yielded decision-relevant outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Unionen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSelecting and analysing climate change adaptation measures at six research sites across Europeen_US
dc.title.alternativeSelecting and analysing climate change adaptation measures at six research sites across Europeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber2145-2161en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciencesen_US
dc.source.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/nhess-21-2145-2021
dc.identifier.cristin1970421
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal