Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoch, Jannis M.
dc.contributor.authorde Bruin, Sophie P
dc.contributor.authorBuhaug, Halvard
dc.contributor.authorvon Uexkull, Nina
dc.contributor.authorvan Beek, Rens
dc.contributor.authorWanders, Niko
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T12:02:17Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T12:02:17Z
dc.date.created2022-01-31T11:48:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Research Letters. 2021, 16 (12), 1-22.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-9326
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053239
dc.description.abstractIn the past decade, several efforts have been made to project armed conflict risk into the future. This study broadens current approaches by presenting a first-of-its-kind application of machine learning (ML) methods to project sub-national armed conflict risk over the African continent along three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios and three Representative Concentration Pathways towards 2050. Results of the open-source ML framework CoPro are consistent with the underlying socioeconomic storylines of the SSPs, and the resulting out-of-sample armed conflict projections obtained with Random Forest classifiers agree with the patterns observed in comparable studies. In SSP1-RCP2.6, conflict risk is low in most regions although the Horn of Africa and parts of East Africa continue to be conflict-prone. Conflict risk increases in the more adverse SSP3-RCP6.0 scenario, especially in Central Africa and large parts of Western Africa. We specifically assessed the role of hydro-climatic indicators as drivers of armed conflict. Overall, their importance is limited compared to main conflict predictors but results suggest that changing climatic conditions may both increase and decrease conflict risk, depending on the location: in Northern Africa and large parts of Eastern Africa climate change increases projected conflict risk whereas for areas in the West and northern part of the Sahel shifting climatic conditions may reduce conflict risk. With our study being at the forefront of ML applications for conflict risk projections, we identify various challenges for this arising scientific field. A major concern is the limited selection of relevant quantified indicators for the SSPs at present. Nevertheless, ML models such as the one presented here are a viable and scalable way forward in the field of armed conflict risk projections, and can help to inform the policy-making process with respect to climate security.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleProjecting armed conflict risk in Africa towards 2050 along the SSP-RCP scenarios: a machine learning approachen_US
dc.title.alternativeProjecting armed conflict risk in Africa towards 2050 along the SSP-RCP scenarios: a machine learning approachen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-22en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Research Lettersen_US
dc.source.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-9326/ac3db2
dc.identifier.cristin1994484
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/648291en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal