Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAevoae, George Marian
dc.contributor.authorAndrieș, Alin Marius
dc.contributor.authorOngena, Steven Roger G.
dc.contributor.authorSprincean, Nicu
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T13:42:25Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T13:42:25Z
dc.date.created2022-10-24T06:29:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0003-6846
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3047172
dc.description.abstractHow do changes in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) scores influence banks’ systemic risk contribution? Using a dynamic panel model, we document a beneficial impact of the ESG Combined Score and Governance pillar on banks’ contribution to system-wide distress analysing a panel of 367 publicly listed banks from 47 countries over the period 2007–2020. Stakeholder theory and theory relating social performance to expected returns in which enhanced investments in corporate social responsibility mitigate bank-specific risks explain our findings. However, only better corporate governance represents a tool in reducing bank interconnectedness and maintaining financial stability. The results are robust to alternative measures of systemic risk, both contribution and exposure, as well as when estimating a static model. Our findings stress the importance of integrating banks’ ESG disclosure into regulatory authorities’ supervisory mechanisms as qualitative information.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.titleESG and systemic risken_US
dc.title.alternativeESG and systemic risken_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalApplied Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2108752
dc.identifier.cristin2064095
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel