Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWashif, Jad Adrian
dc.contributor.authorPyne, David B.
dc.contributor.authorSandbakk, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorTrabelsi, Khaled
dc.contributor.authorAziz, Abdul Rashid
dc.contributor.authorBeaven, Christopher Martyn
dc.contributor.authorKrug, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorMujika, Iñigo
dc.contributor.authorAmmar, Achraf
dc.contributor.authorChaouachi, Anis
dc.contributor.authorMoussa-Chamari, Imen
dc.contributor.authorAloui, Asma
dc.contributor.authorChtourou, Hamdi
dc.contributor.authorFarooq, Abdulaziz
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Monoem
dc.contributor.authorRomdhani, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorSalamh, Paul
dc.contributor.authorTabben, Montassar
dc.contributor.authorWong, Del P.
dc.contributor.authorZerguini, Yacine
dc.contributor.authorDeLang, Matthew D.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Lee
dc.contributor.authorSaad, Helmi Ben
dc.contributor.authorChamari, Karim
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T10:28:52Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T10:28:52Z
dc.date.created2022-11-15T13:35:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBiology of Sport. 2022, 39 (4), 1103-1115.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0860-021X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3046563
dc.description.abstractRamadan intermittent fasting during the COVID-19 lockdown (RIFL) may present unique demands. We investigated training practices (i.e., training load and training times) of athletes, using pre-defined survey criteria/questions, during the ‘first’ COVID-19 lockdown, comparing RIFL to lockdown-alone (LD) in Muslim athletes. Specifically, a within-subject, survey-based study saw athletes (n = 5,529; from 110 countries/territories) training practices (comparing RIFL to LD) explored by comparative variables of: sex; age; continent; athlete classification (e.g., world-class); sport classification (e.g., endurance); athlete status (e.g., professional); and level of training knowledge and beliefs/attitudes (ranked as: good/moderate/poor). During RIFL (compared to LD), athlete perceptions (ranges presented given variety of comparative variables) of their training load decreased (46–62%), were maintained (31–48%) or increased (2–13%). Decreases (≥ 5%, p < 0.05) affected more athletes aged 30–39 years than those 18–29 years (60 vs 55%); more national than international athletes (59 vs 51%); more team sports than precision sports (59 vs 46%); more North American than European athletes (62 vs 53%); more semi-professional than professional athletes (60 vs 54%); more athletes who rated their beliefs/attitudes ‘good’ compared to ‘poor’ and ‘moderate’ (61 vs 54 and 53%, respectively); and more athletes with ‘moderate’ than ‘poor’ knowledge (58 vs 53%). During RIFL, athletes had different strategies for training times, with 13–29% training twice a day (i.e., afternoon and night), 12–26% at night only, and 18–36% in the afternoon only, with ranges depending on the comparative variables. Training loads and activities were altered negatively during RIFL compared to LD. It would be prudent for decision-makers responsible for RIFL athletes to develop programs to support athletes during such challenges.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTermedia Publishingen_US
dc.titleRamadan intermittent fasting induced poorer training practices during the COVID-19 lockdown: A global cross-sectional study with 5529 athletes from 110 countriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeRamadan intermittent fasting induced poorer training practices during the COVID-19 lockdown: A global cross-sectional study with 5529 athletes from 110 countriesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1103-1115en_US
dc.source.volume39en_US
dc.source.journalBiology of Sporten_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/biolsport.2022.117576
dc.identifier.cristin2074260
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel