Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKjelle, Elin
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Eivind Richter
dc.contributor.authorKrokeide, Arne Magnus Hvalbye
dc.contributor.authorSoril, Lesley J.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Bodegom-Vos, Leti
dc.contributor.authorClement, Fiona M.
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Bjørn Morten
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T09:56:28Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T09:56:28Z
dc.date.created2022-06-01T15:42:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Imaging. 2022, 22 1-28.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2342
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3046513
dc.description.abstractBackground Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10–34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging—in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit—is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children. Methods A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included. Results A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations. Conclusions A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCharacterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.title.alternativeCharacterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-28en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Medical Imagingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12880-022-00798-2
dc.identifier.cristin2028803
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 302503en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal