Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKjelle, Elin
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Eivind Richter
dc.contributor.authorKrokeide, Arne Magnus Hvalbye
dc.contributor.authorSoril, Lesley J.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Bodegom-Vos, Leti
dc.contributor.authorClement, Fiona M.
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Bjørn Morten
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T09:56:28Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T09:56:28Z
dc.date.created2022-06-01T15:42:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Imaging. 2022, 22 1-28.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2342
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3046513
dc.description.abstractBackground Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10–34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging—in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit—is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children. Methods A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included. Results A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations. Conclusions A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCharacterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.title.alternativeCharacterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-28en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Medical Imagingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12880-022-00798-2
dc.identifier.cristin2028803
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 302503en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal