Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhatin-Zadeh, Omid
dc.contributor.authorEskandari, Zahra
dc.contributor.authorBanaruee, Hassan
dc.contributor.authorSeckel Santis, María José
dc.contributor.authorAsadipour Farsani, Danyal
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-19T13:51:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-19T13:51:03Z
dc.date.created2022-10-24T13:36:09Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationCogent Arts & Humanities. 2022, 9 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2331-1983
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3044690
dc.description.abstractResults of the studies on the way language and body coordinate in communication (through language and gesture) have significant implications for language, education, and cognitive studies. However, there is a lack of convenient research in this area analyzing perceptual changes within individuals. To fill this gap, we investigated the embodied realizations of literal sentences representing perceptual changes and metaphorical sentences describing the phenomena in terms of perceptual changes. We classified sentences that referred to a visual, auditory, haptic, gustatory, or olfactory change. Participants listened to four narratives that contained five literal sentences describing a real perceptual change and five metaphorical sentences that described a phenomenon in terms of a perceptual change. We analyzed the recorded videos of the participants. The total number of literal sentences that described a real perceptual change was obtained for each modality (visual, auditory, haptic, gustatory, olfactory) separately. Also, the total number of gestures used with each category of these literal statements was obtained. Only iconic and non-iconic gestures that described such perceptual changes as the movement of an object in the space were counted. The results revealed that gestures accompanied at least 53% of literal and 56% of metaphorical sentences. These results suggest that literal and metaphorical perceptual change sentences could be understood as movements at a conceptual level. The similarity between embodied realizations of literal and metaphorical sentences supports one of the main assumptions of the strong version of embodied cognition.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUnderstanding perceptual change as a movement in literal and metaphorical sentencesen_US
dc.title.alternativeUnderstanding perceptual change as a movement in literal and metaphorical sentencesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber13en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalCogent Arts & Humanitiesen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23311983.2022.2118446
dc.identifier.cristin2064436
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal