Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVisioni, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorKravitz, Ben
dc.contributor.authorRobock, Alan
dc.contributor.authorTilmes, Simone
dc.contributor.authorHaywood, Jim M.
dc.contributor.authorBoucher, Oliviér
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Mark
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorNiemeier, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorXia, Lili
dc.contributor.authorChiodo, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorLennard, Chris
dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, Shingo
dc.contributor.authorMoore, John C.
dc.contributor.authorMuri, Helene Østlie
dc.description.abstractThe Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) is a coordinating framework, started in 2010, that includes a series of standardized climate model experiments aimed at understanding the physical processes and projected impacts of solar geoengineering. Numerous experiments have been conducted, and numerous more have been proposed as "testbed'' experiments, spanning a variety of geoengineering techniques aimed at modifying the planetary radiation budget: stratospheric aerosol injection, marine cloud brightening, surface albedo modification, cirrus cloud thinning and sunshade mirrors. To date, more than one hundred studies have been published that used results from GeoMIP simulations. Here we provide a critical assessment of GeoMIP and its experiments. We discuss its successes and missed opportunities, for instance in terms of which experiments elicited more interest from the scientific community and which didn't, and the potential reasons why that happened. We also discuss the knowledge that GeoMIP has contributed to the field of geoengineering research and climate science as a whole: what have we learned in terms of inter-model differences, robustness of the projected outcomes for specific geoengineering methods and future areas of models' development that would be necessary in the future. We also offer multiple examples of cases where GeoMIP experiments were fundamental for international assessments of climate change. Finally, we provide a series of recommendations, regarding both future experiments and more general activities, with the goal of continuously deepening our understanding of the effects of potential geoengineering approaches, as well as reducing uncertainties in climate outcomes, important for assessing wider impacts on societies and ecosystems. In doing so, we refine the purpose of GeoMIP and outline a series of criteria whereby GeoMIP can best serve its participants, stakeholders, and the broader science community.en_US
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Unionen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleOpinion: The Scientific and Community-Building Roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) - Past, Present, and Futureen_US
dc.title.alternativeOpinion: The Scientific and Community-Building Roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) - Past, Present, and Futureen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions (ACPD)en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal