Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCanham, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorSütterlin, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorAsk, Torvald Fossåen
dc.contributor.authorKnox, Benjamin James
dc.contributor.authorGlenister, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorLugo, Ricardo Gregorio
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-30T09:28:32Z
dc.date.available2022-12-30T09:28:32Z
dc.date.created2022-07-27T11:03:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Information Warfare. 2022, 21 (3), 43-58.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1445-3312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3040027
dc.description.abstractHumans quickly and effortlessly impose context onto ambiguous stimuli, as demonstrated through psychological projective testing and ambiguous figures. This feature of human cognition may be weaponized as part of an information operation. Such Ambiguous Self-Induced Disinformation (ASID) attacks would employ the following elements: the introduction of a culturally consistent narrative, the presence of ambiguous stimuli, the motivation for hypervigilance, and a social network. ASID attacks represent a low-risk, low-investment tactic for adversaries with the potential for significant reward, making this an attractive option for information operations within the context of grey-zone conflicts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleAmbiguous Self-Induced Disinformation (ASID) Attacks: Weaponizing a Cognitive Deficiencyen_US
dc.title.alternativeAmbiguous Self-Induced Disinformation (ASID) Attacks: Weaponizing a Cognitive Deficiencyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber43-58en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Information Warfareen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.cristin2039766
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel