Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFasting, Anne
dc.contributor.authorHetlevik, Irene
dc.contributor.authorMjølstad, Bente Prytz
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T09:27:20Z
dc.date.available2022-12-16T09:27:20Z
dc.date.created2021-06-02T18:04:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBMC Family Practice. 2021, 22:64 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3038196
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patients in need of palliative care often want to reside at home. Providing palliative care requires resources and a high level of competence in primary care. The Norwegian guideline for palliative care points to the central role of the regular general practitioner (RGP), specifying a high expected level of competence. Guideline implementation is known to be challenging in primary care. This study investigates adherence to the guideline, the RGPs experience with, and view of their role in palliative care. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed, by post, to all 246 RGPs in a Norwegian county. Themes of the questionnaire focused on experience with palliative and terminal care, the use of recommended work methods from the guideline, communication with partners, self-reported role in palliative care and confidence in providing palliative care. Data were analyzed descriptively, using SPSS. Results: Each RGP had few patients needing palliative care, and limited experience with terminal care at home. Limited experience challenged RGPs possibilities to maintain knowledge about palliative care. Their clinical approach was not in agreement with the guideline, but most of them saw themselves as central, and were confident in the provision of palliative care. Rural RGPs saw themselves as more central in this work than their urban colleagues. Conclusions: This study demonstrated low adherence of the RGPs, to the Norwegian guideline for palliative care. Guideline requirements may not correspond with the methods of general practice, making them difficult to adopt. The RGPs seemed to have too few clinical cases over time to maintain skills at a complex and specialized level. Yet, there seems to be a great potential for the RGP, with the inherent specialist skills of the general practitioner, to be a key worker in the palliative care trajectory.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://bmcprimcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectAllmennmedisinen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen_US
dc.subjectPalliasjonen_US
dc.subjectPalliative careen_US
dc.titlePalliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norwayen_US
dc.title.alternativePalliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske fag: 700en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Midical sciences: 700en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.volume22:64en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Family Practiceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8
dc.identifier.cristin1913392
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal