Shareholder litigation rights and ESG controversies: A quasi-natural experiment
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3033686Utgivelsesdato
2022Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- NTNU Handelshøyskolen [1717]
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [38688]
Sammendrag
Leveraging as a quasi-natural experiment the staggered passage of universal demand laws, which raise the difficulty of shareholder lawsuits, we examine the effect of shareholder litigation rights on ESG controversies. Our difference-in-differences estimates show that an exogenous decline in shareholder litigation risk results in a significant drop in ESG controversies. Specifically, ESG controversies fall by 40.85% in response to an exogenous reduction in litigation risk. When more insulated from shareholder litigation, managers prefer to live a quiet life, intentionally avoiding risky and contentious activities, which require more managerial time and effort. Additional analysis validates the results, including propensity score matching, entropy balancing, and Oster's (2019) testing of coefficient stability. Finally, we find that ESG controversies erode firm profitability considerably, consistent with the theoretical expectations.