Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCarlsen, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorLeknes, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-23T13:03:42Z
dc.date.available2022-11-23T13:03:42Z
dc.date.created2020-08-25T09:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRegional studies. 2020, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0034-3404
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3033664
dc.description.abstractThere is no consensus about the relation between urban scale and quality of life. Quality of life in Oslo and the rest of Norway is compared using two commonly employed methods to measure geographical variation in quality of life: hedonic pricing based on the Rosen–Roback model and analysis of subjective well-being. Since the hedonic pricing approach assumes that households are perfectly mobile, the population is divided into mobility quartiles. The methods arrive at the same conclusion for the most mobile population group – quality of life is higher in Oslo – but different conclusions are reached for other mobility groups.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupen_US
dc.titleMobility and urban quality of life: a comparison of the hedonic pricing and subjective well-being methodsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.journalRegional studiesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00343404.2020.1800624
dc.identifier.cristin1824936
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 255509en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel