dc.contributor.author | Remus, Alexandria | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Valerie | |
dc.contributor.author | Gutke, Annelie | |
dc.contributor.author | Mena, Juan Jose Saldaña | |
dc.contributor.author | Mørkved, Siv | |
dc.contributor.author | Wikmar, Lena Nilsson | |
dc.contributor.author | Öberg, Birgitta | |
dc.contributor.author | Olsson, Christina | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, Hilde Stendal | |
dc.contributor.author | Stuge, Britt | |
dc.contributor.author | Wuytack, Francesca | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-22T11:23:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-22T11:23:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-09-08T14:29:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | PLOS ONE. 2021, 16 (2), 1-13. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3033356 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background
Inconsistent reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of women with Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) hinders comparison of findings and the reliability of evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) can address this issue as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials on the condition. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in PGP during pregnancy and postpartum for use in research and clinical practice.
Methods
A systematic review of previous studies on PGP and semi-structured interviews with women were undertaken to identify all outcomes that were reported in prior studies and that are relevant to those experiencing the condition. Key stakeholders (clinicians, researchers, service providers/policy makers and individuals with PGP) then rated the importance of these outcomes for including in a preliminary PGP-COS using a 3-round Delphi study. The final COS was agreed at a face-to-face consensus meeting.
Results
Consensus was achieved on five outcomes for inclusion in the final PGP-COS. All outcomes are grouped under the “life impact” domain and include: pain frequency, pain intensity/severity, function/disability/activity limitation, health-related quality of life and fear avoidance.
Conclusion
This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in pregnancy-related and postpartum-related PGP in research and clinical settings. It is advocated that all trials, other non-randomised studies and clinicians in this area use this COS by reporting these outcomes as a minimum. This will ensure the reporting of meaningful outcomes and will enable the findings of future studies to be compared and combined. Future work will determine how to measure the outcomes of the PGP-COS. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | PLOS, Public Library of Science | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | A core outcome set for research and clinical practice in women with pelvic girdle pain: PGP-COS | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 1-13 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | PLOS ONE | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0247466 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1932513 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |