Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHwang, Chulmin
dc.contributor.authorOh, Sungkyun
dc.contributor.authorKim, Donghoi
dc.contributor.authorGundersen, Truls
dc.contributor.authorLim, Yongsub
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T07:25:09Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T07:25:09Z
dc.date.created2022-02-14T15:34:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Reports. 2022, 8, 2351-2362.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2352-4847
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032685
dc.description.abstractDue to tighter environmental regulations, newly built liquefied natural gas (LNG) carriers are equipped with a re-liquefaction system to minimize combustion of surplus boil-off-gas (BOG). Thus, this paper comparatively analyzes the re-liquefaction system for a low-pressure gas injection engine according to the refrigerant (no external refrigerant or single mixed refrigerant) with three key performance indicators: energy, economic, and environmental aspects. For an energy efficiency analysis, we proposed several process alternatives and optimized them to minimize the specific power consumption required to liquefy BOG. In economic analysis, minimizing total annualized cost is the objective. For an environmental analysis, CO2 emissions at each optimal point is calculated and comparatively analyzed. The results show that the process without external refrigerant has 10% better performance in terms of economy, while the single mixed refrigerant process is suitable in terms of energy efficiency (6%) and environmental (15%) impact.en_US
dc.description.abstractEnergy, economic and environmental analysis of a BOG re-liquefaction process for an LNG carrieren_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEnergy, economic and environmental analysis of a BOG re-liquefaction process for an LNG carrieren_US
dc.title.alternativeEnergy, economic and environmental analysis of a BOG re-liquefaction process for an LNG carrieren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber2351-2362en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Reportsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.098
dc.identifier.cristin2001465
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal