Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPinciroli Vago, Nicolo' Oreste
dc.contributor.authorMilani, Federico
dc.contributor.authorFraternali, Piero
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Ricardo Da Silva
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T10:38:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-18T10:38:05Z
dc.date.created2021-07-24T12:22:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Imaging. 2021, 7 (7), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2313-433X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3026613
dc.description.abstractIconography studies the visual content of artworks by considering the themes portrayedin them and their representation. Computer Vision has been used to identify iconographic subjectsin paintings and Convolutional Neural Networks enabled the effective classification of charactersin Christian art paintings. However, it still has to be demonstrated if the classification resultsobtained by CNNs rely on the same iconographic properties that human experts exploit whenstudying iconography and if the architecture of a classifier trained on whole artwork images canbe exploited to support the much harder task of object detection. A suitable approach for exposingthe process of classification by neural models relies on Class Activation Maps, which emphasize theareas of an image contributing the most to the classification. This work compares state-of-the-artalgorithms (CAM, Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Smooth Grad-CAM++) in terms of their capacityof identifying the iconographic attributes that determine the classification of characters in Christianart paintings. Quantitative and qualitative analyses show that Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, andSmooth Grad-CAM++ have similar performances while CAM has lower efficacy. Smooth Grad-CAM++ isolates multiple disconnected image regions that identify small iconographic symbols well.Grad-CAM produces wider and more contiguous areas that cover large iconographic symbols better.The salient image areas computed by the CAM algorithms have been used to estimate object-levelbounding boxes and a quantitative analysis shows that the boxes estimated with Grad-CAM reach55% average IoU, 61% GT-known localization and 31% mAP. The obtained results are a step towardsthe computer-aided study of the variations of iconographic elements positioning and mutual relationsin artworks and open the way to the automatic creation of bounding boxes for training detectors oficonographic symbols in Christian art images.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparing CAM Algorithms for the Identification of Salient Image Features in Iconography Artwork Analysisen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparing CAM Algorithms for the Identification of Salient Image Features in Iconography Artwork Analysisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume7en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Imagingen_US
dc.source.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jimaging7070106
dc.identifier.cristin1922540
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal