Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKoivunen, Sanna
dc.contributor.authorViljakainen, Matti
dc.contributor.authorMännistö, Tuija
dc.contributor.authorGissler, Mika
dc.contributor.authorPouta, Anneli
dc.contributor.authorKaaja, Risto
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Johan G.
dc.contributor.authorLaivuori, Hannele
dc.contributor.authorKajantie, Eero Olavi
dc.contributor.authorVääräsmäki, Marja
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T12:11:08Z
dc.date.available2022-09-01T12:11:08Z
dc.date.created2021-01-25T16:56:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2020, 15 (3), 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3015153
dc.description.abstractObjective To assess the frequency and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) defined by the criteria according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) diagnostic criteria for GDM. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Six secondary and tertiary delivery hospitals in Finland in 2009. Population Pregnant women (N = 4,033) and their offspring. Methods We used data on comprehensive screening of pregnant women with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), performed between gestational weeks 24 and 40. OGTT glucose concentrations were used to identify women who fulfilled IADPSG and NICE criteria. While cut-offs according to Finnish national criteria partly overlapped with both criteria, a subgroup of IADPSG- or NICE-positive GDM women remained undiagnosed by Finnish criteria and hence non-treated. They were analysed as subgroups and compared to controls who were negative with all cut-offs. Main outcome measures GDM prevalence, birth weight SD score (BWSDS), large for gestational age (LGA) and caesarean section (CS) rates. Results Among the 4,033 women screened for GDM, 1,249 (31.0%) and 529 (13.1%) had GDM according to the IADPSG and NICE criteria, respectively. The LGA rate was similar in both groups. Regardless of the diagnostic criteria, women with GDM had a higher risk of induced delivery and CSs than controls. In IADPSG-positive non-treated women, offspring’s BWSDS and CS rate were higher than in controls. Conclusions GDM prevalence was 2.4-fold higher according to the IADPSG compared with the NICE criteria but the LGA rate did not differ. BWSDS and CS rate were increased already with mild untreated hyperglycaemia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePregnancy outcomes according to the definition of gestational diabetesen_US
dc.title.alternativePregnancy outcomes according to the definition of gestational diabetesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0229496
dc.identifier.cristin1878810
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal